Feinberg
Northwestern Medicine | Northwestern University | Faculty Profiles

News Center

  • Categories
    • Campus News
    • Disease Discoveries
    • Clinical Breakthroughs
    • Education News
    • Scientific Advances
    • Podcast
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Cancer
    • Neurology and Neuroscience
    • Aging and Longevity
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • News Archives
  • About Us
    • Media Contact
    • Share Your News
    • News Feeds
    • Social Media
    • Contact Us
Menu
  • Categories
    • Campus News
    • Disease Discoveries
    • Clinical Breakthroughs
    • Education News
    • Scientific Advances
    • Podcast
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Cancer
    • Neurology and Neuroscience
    • Aging and Longevity
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • News Archives
  • About Us
    • Media Contact
    • Share Your News
    • News Feeds
    • Social Media
    • Contact Us
Home » Pinpointing Cost-Effective Diagnostics for a Common Urological Condition
Clinical Breakthroughs

Pinpointing Cost-Effective Diagnostics for a Common Urological Condition

By Anna WilliamsMay 2, 2017
Share
Facebook Twitter Email
ghomrawi
Hassan Ghomrawi, PhD, MPH, associate professor of Surgery and of Pediatrics, was the senior author of the study published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

A combination of ultrasound and cystoscopy is the most cost-effective approach to detecting cancer in patients who show microscopic amounts of blood in their urine, according to a study published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria (AMH) — where three or more red blood cells are present in the urine, with no symptoms — is a common incidental finding in adults who receive a routine urine test.

Though the condition is benign in most cases, small amounts of blood in the urine can sometimes be a sign of genitourinary cancer, and as such, AMH often prompts further patient evaluation. But there has been disagreement over the optimal strategy for diagnosing such patients.

The approach currently recommended by the American Urological Association is a combination of CT scan and cystoscopy, a procedure that allows for visualization of the inside of the bladder and urethra. While effective at detecting cancers, the protocol is also costly and can carry certain risks, including radiation exposure and urinary tract infection.

“Many thousands of patients every year are found to have microscopic hematuria, so the strategy we choose for evaluation of these patients has far-reaching consequences. Our goal should be to maximize cancer diagnosis, while minimizing costs and harm to patients,” said senior author Hassan Ghomrawi, PhD, MPH, associate professor of Surgery and of Pediatrics and a member of the Center for Healthcare Studies.

In the study, Ghomrawi, along with co-authors at Weill Cornell Medicine — Joshua Halpern, MD, a urology resident, and Bilal Chughtai, MD, assistant professor of urology — evaluated the cost-effectiveness of four common approaches for the initial evaluation of patients with AMH: a combination of CT scan and cystoscopy (the current standard); a combination of renal ultrasound and cystoscopy; CT scan alone; and cystoscopy alone.

The investigators found that the combination of ultrasound and cystoscopy was the most cost-effective among the four approaches, identifying 245 cancers per 10,000 patients, at a cost of $53,000 per cancer. CT scan combined with cystoscopy detected 246 cancers — just one additional cancer — but at an incremental cost of more than $6 million per cancer detected. CT scan alone detected the fewest number of cancers per patients, followed by cystoscopy alone.

“We hope that our study will empower clinicians to choose ultrasound instead of CT for their patients with microscopic hematuria,” Ghomrawi said. “Not only will this be a less costly evaluation, but it will also spare many patients exposure to radiation from a CT that may be harmful in the long term. Ultimately, we hope that our findings will also help shape future guidelines from the American Urological Association.”

The authors caution that the recommendations are on a population-level, and that each patient should still be considered on an individual basis, given unique risk factors and preferences. “Ultrasound may be the best test for the majority of patients, but CT may still be appropriate in some patients,” Ghomrawi added. “It is crucial that patients and physicians engage in shared decision-making when confronted with this condition.”

Cancer Hospital Medicine Research Urology
Share. Facebook Twitter Email

Related Posts

Hospitals Bound to Patient Safety Rules that Aren’t all Backed by Evidence

Jun 24, 2022

Identifying Protein Interactions that Promote Cancer Growth

Jun 24, 2022

Combination Treatment May Improve Quality of Life in Kidney Cancer

Jun 23, 2022

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Student Spearheads Ukraine Aid Efforts

Jun 27, 2022

Hospitals Bound to Patient Safety Rules that Aren’t all Backed by Evidence

Jun 24, 2022

Identifying Protein Interactions that Promote Cancer Growth

Jun 24, 2022

Combination Treatment May Improve Quality of Life in Kidney Cancer

Jun 23, 2022

Calcium Channel Blockers May Improve Chemotherapy Response

Jun 21, 2022
  • News Center Home
  • Categories
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
  • News Archives
  • About Us
Flickr Photos
pride7
pride6
pride5
pride4
pride3
pride2
pride1
20220607_Feinberg Campus_0070
20220607_Feinberg Campus_0066
20220607_Feinberg Campus_0054
Northwestern University 2022. Photo by Jim Prisching
20220607_Feinberg Campus_0077

Northwestern University logo

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

RSS Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Flickr YouTube Instagram
Copyright © 2022 Northwestern University
  • Contact Northwestern University
  • Disclaimer
  • Campus Emergency Information
  • Policy Statements

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.