Defining the Biology of Autism

By

https://soundcloud.com/user-549060398/understanding-the-biology-of-autism-with-feinberg-scientist-peter-penzes-phd

This article originally appeared in the Breakthroughs newsletter. Listen to the Breakthroughs Podcast for more about autism neurobiology research at Northwestern.

When approaching faculty to gauge interest in a new Feinberg center focusing on autism, Peter Penzes, PhD, Ruth and Evelyn Dunbar Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, received puzzled responses from some professors and scientists.

“It turns out there are a range of scientists and labs at Northwestern studying various aspects of autism and its development at a basic science level or a clinical level — but many of them didn’t know about each other.”

Penzes hopes those days are in the past with the launch of the new Center for Autism and Neurodevelopment (CAN), a translational science hub that aims to investigate the neurobiology of autism and facilitate the development of new treatments.

Penzes, as director of the center, recruited 28 scientists from basic science, translational and clinical specialties — a bottom-up approach that will both foster collaboration and train the next generation of scientists in the fields of autism and neurodevelopment.

In addition, CAN will host nationally renowned speakers in a monthly seminar series, to inform Northwestern and the larger community about the latest in autism research across the globe.

“This center is the glue that will bring all these people together,” Penzes said.

A Blank Slate

In comparison to other neurological diseases such as Parkinson’s disease or Alzheimer’s disease, the neurobiology of autism is relatively unstudied, according to Penzes.

penzes
Peter Penzes, PhD, Ruth and Evelyn Dunbar Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, is the inaugural director of the Center for Autism and Neurodevelopment.

“Up until ten years ago, all we knew about autism was based on symptoms displayed by patients,” Penzes said.

Today, advances in genomic sequencing technology and the realization that autism is much more common than previously thought — now estimated at one in 68 children — have placed the genetic component of autism at the forefront.

However, even with strong efforts over the past five years, the specific genetic mechanisms remain opaque, according to Penzes. Some children’s autism may be traced back to a single gene, but those cases are rare — more common are hundreds of small gene variations that cumulatively result in an autism spectrum disorder, making it difficult to zero in on the genes that lead to specific neurophysiological changes.

In addition, there’s no established biomarker for autism, further complicating investigations. While diseases such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s have protein deposits that can indicate disease, there’s no objective measure of autism, according to Penzes, making it difficult to determine if a treatment is working, for example.

CAN hopes to build personalized treatments from the ground up, grouping together patients with similar genetic mutations, identifying the exact time and place where normal brain development is diverted off course and developing drugs to treat those biological changes.

Western Blots to Pills and Shots

While identifying groups of patients with similar mutations may sound simple, about 1,000 genes have been linked with autism so far, and that number is only growing. Narrowing the pool by studying conditions linked to autism but with a more homogenous genetic cause is a strategy used by some scientists, including Anis Contractor, PhD, professor of Physiology.

Contractor studies fragile X syndrome (FXS), a genetic disorder in which about half of all patients are also diagnosed with autism — making it the single largest monogenic (linked to a mutation in a single gene) cause of autism in the United States. While most genetic mutations that cause autism are rare, patients with FXS have the mutations in a single gene on the X chromosome, so FXS can be used as a laboratory model for certain aspects of autism, including sensory hypersensitivity.

Anis Contractor, PhD Physiology and Neurobiolog at FSM.
Anis Contractor, PhD, professor of Physiology, studies Fragile X syndrome, a genetic disorder in which about half of all patients are also diagnosed with autism.

“A lot of patients don’t like loud sounds or don’t like to be touched,” Contractor said. “When I talk to parents of children with autism, some tell me these sensory issues lead to many other problems, because the kids are withdrawn or socially isolated.”

The exact neurobiology behind this symptom is unknown, so Contractor tracked the development of the sensory cortex in mouse models of FXS, finding there were several “critical periods” of synapse formation that were delayed in the mouse model of the disorder.

“The timing of these critical periods has to be perfect — if you mistime them, the whole system doesn’t wire properly,” Contractor said. “In the FXS mouse, the sensory response from the whiskers excites more neurons in the cortex than it should; we think that is partially responsible for the hypersensitivity symptoms.”

Digging deeper, Contractor traced the critical period shift to an imbalance of intracellular chloride. He said a drug originally approved for hypertension could possibly be used to correct the critical period shift, due to its action on chloride transporters in developing neurons.

“They’ve actually conducted clinical trials of this drug in France and given it to children with autism,” Contractor said. “While it was a small population and the drug’s not perfect, it improved behavioral scores significantly.”

Through the Looking Glass

Genetics aren’t the only starting point for the translational pipeline — imaging will also have a role to play at CAN, according to John Csernansky, PhD, chair of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

Csernansky_0017_250.jpg
John Csernansky, PhD, chair of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, believes imaging may have a role to play in defining the neurobiology of autism.

“Using imaging to better understand brain function in subjects with autism may help us to identify the precise brain circuits that are affected by the disorder, which could lead to new interventions such as drugs or behavioral therapies,” said Csernansky, also the Lizzie Gilman Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. “The new center will help us identify new collaborators and start new projects.”

Techniques are available that can help autistic patients ease into studies that include imaging, according to Csernansky.

“Patients with autism can be uncomfortable being confined in closed spaces, such as the MR scanner,” Csernansky said. “However, individuals with autism can become more comfortable with the MR scanner by having them spend time in a ‘mock’ scanner, which simulates the space and noise of the MR scanner.”

Ahead of the Pack

The field of autism neurobiology is ripe for discovery: It’s historically understudied and new technology now allows scientists to quickly and cheaply sequence a patient’s genome or grow models of a patient’s brain and test therapies.

While other institutions may have some form of autism research initiative, CAN is unique for its singular focus on translational science, according to Penzes.

“Most autism centers are doing only patient care,” Penzes said. “There are very few places where you have 28 scientists from across disciplines that are brought together with the unifying goal of understanding the neurobiology of autism.”

“If there are new drugs for autism, this is where they are going to come from,” Penzes added.