Feinberg
Northwestern Medicine | Northwestern University | Faculty Profiles

News Center

  • Categories
    • Campus News
    • Disease Discoveries
    • Clinical Breakthroughs
    • Education News
    • Scientific Advances
    • Podcast
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Cancer
    • Neurology and Neuroscience
    • Aging and Longevity
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • News Archives
  • About Us
    • Media Contact
    • Share Your News
    • News Feeds
    • Social Media
    • Contact Us
Menu
  • Categories
    • Campus News
    • Disease Discoveries
    • Clinical Breakthroughs
    • Education News
    • Scientific Advances
    • Podcast
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Cancer
    • Neurology and Neuroscience
    • Aging and Longevity
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • News Archives
  • About Us
    • Media Contact
    • Share Your News
    • News Feeds
    • Social Media
    • Contact Us
Home » Investigating Quality of Life After Breast Reconstruction
Clinical Breakthroughs

Investigating Quality of Life After Breast Reconstruction

By Anna WilliamsApr 12, 2017
Share
Facebook Twitter Email
fine-md-neil-a
Neil Fine, MD, clinical associate professor of Surgery in the Division of Plastic Surgery, was a co-author of the study evaluating patients’ quality of life after post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.

After a mastectomy, women who underwent autologous breast reconstruction — where the breast is rebuilt using tissue taken from the patient’s own body — reported greater psychosocial and sexual well-being than those who chose implant-based reconstruction, according to a recent Northwestern Medicine study.

The study, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, also found that women who elected for either type of breast reconstruction reported overall satisfaction with their breasts at levels equal to or greater than baseline. However, patients in both groups also reported worse physical well-being, at one-year follow-up, than before their mastectomies.

“This is a big step in our search for better information to inform women of what they may expect after breast reconstructive surgery,” said Neil Fine, MD, clinical associate professor of Surgery in the Division of Plastic Surgery, and a co-author of the paper.

In recent years, the rate of women undergoing mastectomies for breast cancer has risen, along with the rate of patients choosing breast reconstruction, which can help restore body image and reduce some of the distress associated with a mastectomy. But data on patient-reported outcomes and quality of life after such reconstruction has been limited.

The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC), a five-year prospective study, was designed to address these knowledge gaps and compare outcomes of two major categories of breast reconstruction: autologous and implant-based.

The current paper, a sub-study of the MROC, included 1,183 women who had undergone immediate reconstruction after a mastectomy at 11 medical sites across the United States and Canada. The patients completed questionnaires before and one year after surgery.

The investigators discovered that women who elected for autologous reconstruction had greater overall satisfaction with their breasts than those who chose implants, and reported better outcomes on other quality of life measurements. Physical well-being, however, did not return to pre-surgery levels in either group, with patients reporting increased pain and tightness after implants, as well as abdominal discomfort and weakness after autologous reconstruction.

“This data is the most comprehensive available today, but it is not perfect,” Fine said. “Women who require mastectomy need to be cautioned that this is averaged information. It is also important to always consider alternatives, including the option of not having reconstruction.”

The authors note that the study’s findings could help improve patients’ understanding of expected outcomes as they make a decision about breast reconstruction, as well as advance future research into improving reconstruction techniques.

John Kim, MD, professor of Surgery in the Division of Plastic Surgery and of Dermatology, was the principal investigator at the Northwestern Memorial Hospital site for MROC. The research was supported by National Cancer Institute Grant No. R01 CA152192 and in part by National Cancer Institute Support Grant No. P30 CA008748.

Cancer Patient Care Research Surgery Women's Health
Share. Facebook Twitter Email

Related Posts

Epigenetic Biomarkers Predict CVD Risk

Jun 28, 2022

Hospitals Bound to Patient Safety Rules that Aren’t all Backed by Evidence

Jun 24, 2022

Identifying Protein Interactions that Promote Cancer Growth

Jun 24, 2022

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Epigenetic Biomarkers Predict CVD Risk

Jun 28, 2022

Student Spearheads Ukraine Aid Efforts

Jun 27, 2022

Hospitals Bound to Patient Safety Rules that Aren’t all Backed by Evidence

Jun 24, 2022

Identifying Protein Interactions that Promote Cancer Growth

Jun 24, 2022

Combination Treatment May Improve Quality of Life in Kidney Cancer

Jun 23, 2022
  • News Center Home
  • Categories
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
  • News Archives
  • About Us
Flickr Photos
20220617_NM_0434
20220617_NM_0858
20220617_NM_0643
20220617_NM_0835
20220617_NM_0544
20220617_NM_0450
20220617_NM_0790
20220617_NM_0811
20220617_NM_0851
20220617_NM_0696
20220617_NM_0779
20220617_NM_0838

Northwestern University logo

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

RSS Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Flickr YouTube Instagram
Copyright © 2022 Northwestern University
  • Contact Northwestern University
  • Disclaimer
  • Campus Emergency Information
  • Policy Statements

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.