Feinberg
Northwestern Medicine | Northwestern University | Faculty Profiles

News Center

  • Categories
    • Campus News
    • Disease Discoveries
    • Clinical Breakthroughs
    • Education News
    • Scientific Advances
  • Press Releases
  • Media Coverage
  • Podcasts
  • Editor’s Picks
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Cancer
    • Neurology and Neuroscience
    • Aging and Longevity
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • News Archives
  • About Us
    • Media Contact
    • Share Your News
    • News Feeds
    • Social Media
    • Contact Us
Menu
  • Categories
    • Campus News
    • Disease Discoveries
    • Clinical Breakthroughs
    • Education News
    • Scientific Advances
  • Press Releases
  • Media Coverage
  • Podcasts
  • Editor’s Picks
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Cancer
    • Neurology and Neuroscience
    • Aging and Longevity
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • News Archives
  • About Us
    • Media Contact
    • Share Your News
    • News Feeds
    • Social Media
    • Contact Us
Home » Grant Writing Groups Capitalize on Peer Review, Real-Time Feedback
Uncategorized

Grant Writing Groups Capitalize on Peer Review, Real-Time Feedback

By Roger AndersonFeb 20, 2013
Share
Facebook Twitter Email

Daniela Menichella, MD, PhD, instructor of neurology, discusses a one page response for a K08 award with Rick McGee, PhD, associate dean for faculty recruitment and professional development, during a grant writing group on Tuesday, February 19. 

Successful scientists are inevitably effective writers. 

“The point of every research proposal is to capture someone’s interest with a clearly formed idea,” said Rick McGee, PhD, associate dean for faculty recruitment and professional development. “It is essential for young investigators to learn how to communicate what they need to say effectively.” 

For the past five years, McGee has facilitated a novel grant-writing program that helps guide groups of junior faculty through the process of writing National Institutes of Health (NIH) K and R award applications. With new groups of up to 25 researchers beginning four months before NIH deadlines, the weekly 90-minute sessions provide guidance in real time. 

Reviewing portions of two to four proposals each session, program participants engage in peer feedback as a way of learning the necessary framework of grant writing.

“Because it is often difficult to recognize gap’s in one’s own work, participants learn how to make their writing better by offering feedback on what is unclear in each other’s proposals,” McGee said. “We also walk participants through and track the specific patterns in successful NIH-style grant writing. It’s a learnable skill that we help impart.” 

Breaking into subgroups of three to eight investigators, based on award type and if it is a new proposal or resubmission, faculty develop and revise their work throughout the process. 

“I really enjoyed the small group setting where people who were writing R01s could exchange their specific aims and critique each other’s work. It helped me gain perspective on critical thinking,” said Lei Wang, PhD, assistant professor in psychiatry and behavioral sciences and radiology, who used the group to help write three applications at the R01 level. “The help that I got from this activity was critical in getting two of them funded, with the third one in the resubmission stage. To me, this was an invaluable service.” 

Supplementing group sessions are a number of online resources meant to help teach the patterns of NIH proposals. Going as far as to breakdown each sentence of a researcher’s specific aims, the most important page of a proposal that summarizes the project, the grant-writers group works to create better communication by evaluating the reason behind every statement made. 

“Knowing the architecture and recognizing the patterns of a good proposal is extremely helpful,” McGee said. “This group differs from listening to a seminar because we are actually practicing the skillset. But it’s more than just writing. We work to develop the entire approach and way of thinking.” 

Having helped more than 220 faculty members develop new proposals or work on resubmissions, McGee has tracked 35 NIH-funded projects. 

The grant writers groups are supported by the Faculty Affairs Office and the Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute. Faculty members interested in joining the next session, which begins mid-March, should should email McGee at: r-mcgee@northwestern.edu.

Education
Share. Facebook Twitter Email

Related Posts

Mar 29, 2023

Adolescent Sexual Health Program Receives Funding for Social Marketing Campaign

Mar 29, 2023
Mar 7, 2023

A Day in the Life: Evan Edwards

Mar 7, 2023

Changes in Medical School Leadership

Jan 26, 2023

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Self-Powered Wireless Implant Delivers Medication, Then Dissolves

Mar 30, 2023

Adolescent Sexual Health Program Receives Funding for Social Marketing Campaign

Mar 29, 2023

The Future of IgE-Mediated Allergy Research and Treatments

Mar 29, 2023

Weintraub Appointed to Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Elder Law

Mar 28, 2023

Investigating Protein’s Role in Hearing Loss

Mar 27, 2023
  • News Center Home
  • Categories
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
  • News Archives
  • About Us
Flickr Photos
20230317_NM651
20230317_NM610
20230317_NM569
20230317_NM537
20230317_NM331
20230317_NM323
20230317_NM316
20230317_NM336
20230317_NM626
20230317_NM662
20230317_NM655
20230317_NM642

Northwestern University logo

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

RSS Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Flickr YouTube Instagram
Copyright © 2023 Northwestern University
  • Contact Northwestern University
  • Disclaimer
  • Campus Emergency Information
  • Policy Statements

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.