Feinberg
Northwestern Medicine | Northwestern University | Faculty Profiles

News Center

  • Categories
    • Campus News
    • Disease Discoveries
    • Clinical Breakthroughs
    • Education News
    • Scientific Advances
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Podcasts
  • Editor’s Picks
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Cancer
    • Neurology and Neuroscience
    • Aging and Longevity
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • News Archives
  • About Us
    • Media Contact
    • Share Your News
    • News Feeds
    • Social Media
    • Contact Us
Menu
  • Categories
    • Campus News
    • Disease Discoveries
    • Clinical Breakthroughs
    • Education News
    • Scientific Advances
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Podcasts
  • Editor’s Picks
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Cancer
    • Neurology and Neuroscience
    • Aging and Longevity
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • News Archives
  • About Us
    • Media Contact
    • Share Your News
    • News Feeds
    • Social Media
    • Contact Us
Home » Tattoos and Piercings Go Mainstream, but Risks Continue
Uncategorized

Tattoos and Piercings Go Mainstream, but Risks Continue

By medwebJun 1, 2006
Share
Facebook Twitter Email

Tattoos and Piercings Go Mainstream, but Risks Continue

CHICAGO—Almost a fourth of men and women between ages 18 and 50 currently sport a tattoo, and almost 15 percent have at least one body piercing, according to a survey from Northwestern University. Survey results were published in the June issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Anne E. Laumann, MD, associate professor of dermatology at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, and colleagues conducted the study in 500 randomly selected people aged 18 to 50 from across the United States in 2004 to assess the prevalence of body art—tattoos and body piercing (other than soft earlobes)—and the medical complications and social risks associated with these activities.

Dr. Laumann and co-researcher Amy J. Derick, MD, of the University of Chicago, found that year of birth was a predictive factor for tattoos: 36 percent of people ages 18 to 29; 24 percent of those ages 30 to 40; and only 15 percent of those ages 40 to 50 had tattoos. Sixteen percent had obtained their first tattoo before age18.

People of lower educational status were more likely to have a tattoo and to have more than one tattoo than those of higher educational status.

Drinking alcohol and using recreational drugs were related to having tattoos. More than a third of ex-drinkers and a fourth of current drinkers had tattoos, as did almost 40 percent of those who had ever used recreational drugs and 60 percent of those who have been in jail for more than three days.

Tattoos were seen in all ethnic groups but were more common among those with Hispanic ancestry than among all other ethnic groups combined.

Only 13 percent of those with a tattoo reported any problems with healing during the first two weeks after the tattoo, and most of those individuals had their procedure done outside of a professional tattoo parlor. Fewer than 2 percent reported any ongoing problems.

“Self-reported complications of tattooing were surprisingly rare, although whether there is an increased risk of hepatitis C and other blood-borne infectious diseases remains unclear,” Dr. Laumann said.

“The Centers for Disease Control says hepatitis C is not an issue, but tattooing clearly presents a mechanism for transmission. Other demographic features associated with tattoo prevalence are associated with hepatitis C risk as well. More data on this issue are needed,” Dr. Laumann said.

About a quarter of study participants had regrets about their tattoo. About 5 percent had already covered a tattoo with a new tattoo and a further 17 percent said they were considering tattoo removal. Individuals who were younger than 18 when they were first tattooed were more likely than older persons to have regrets.

“These data indicate a sizeable population of persons is interested in tattoo removal, and that supports ongoing research on pigment composition, labeling, and removal methods,” Dr. Laumann said.

The researchers found that women accounted for almost three fourths of people with body piercings (not including earlobes); a third got their first piercing under the age of 18. Unlike tattoos, the prevalence of body piercing did not vary by educational status or income level. However, as in those with tattoos, piercing was strongly associated with alcohol and recreational drug use, jail time, and lack of religious affiliation.

Complications were very common with body piercing. About a fourth of those with body piercing reported complications, consisting mostly of minor skin infections, but the majority lasted longer or began later than three weeks.

Strikingly, in those with tongue, lip, or cheek piercings, a fourth had broken teeth attributed to their oral jewelry.

Prevalence of jewelry allergy increased with the number of piercings. While 12 percent of those never pierced reported a jewelry allergy, the reaction rate doubled to 25 percent among those with only soft ear lobe piercings, and was even higher—more than 40 percent—among those with soft ear lobe and body piercings.

Few states have effective regulation relating to body art, Dr. Laumann said, and up to three-fourths of children younger than age 18 who have tattoos or body piercings did not ask permission of or even inform their parents. Dr. Laumann noted that state regulations regarding tattooing and body piercing vary widely. The stringency of the regulations has increased in recent years, and a bill (SB927) regulating the tattoo and body piercing establishments in Illinois has recently passed both houses and is on the governor’s desk for signature at this time.

“The real question is whether any hepatitis C association found is related to direct transmission of disease through the needle pricks or whether tattoos and body piercings are markers for other risky behaviors that lead to infection,” Dr. Laumann said. “We have documented that these associations continue to exist.”

This study was supported by grants from the Portes Center, administered though the Institute of Medicine of Chicago, and the Sage Foundation.

Share. Facebook Twitter Email

Related Posts

Lurie Cancer Center Receives Merit Extension from NCI

Oct 20, 2021

Drug Combination May Reduce Risk of Leukemia Relapse

Mar 26, 2020

Rewriting the Role of a Transcription Factor

Mar 19, 2020

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Workshop Teaches Medical Students Diagnosis Skills in Dermatology

Feb 7, 2023

Genetic Variations Influence Drug Metabolism in Patients of African Descent

Feb 7, 2023

Potential Therapeutic Target for Schizophrenia Identified 

Feb 6, 2023

Longtime Alcohol Consumption Speeds Up Biological Aging 

Feb 3, 2023

Grant Provides Imaging Technology to Department of Ophthalmology

Feb 2, 2023
  • News Center Home
  • Categories
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
  • News Archives
  • About Us
Flickr Photos
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-24
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-16
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-14
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-5
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-6
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-10
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-8
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-18
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-23
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-25
Feinberg_In_Vivo_20221209_tcrawford-26

Northwestern University logo

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

RSS Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Flickr YouTube Instagram
Copyright © 2023 Northwestern University
  • Contact Northwestern University
  • Disclaimer
  • Campus Emergency Information
  • Policy Statements

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.