Feinberg
Northwestern Medicine | Northwestern University | Faculty Profiles

News Center

  • Categories
    • Campus News
    • Disease Discoveries
    • Clinical Breakthroughs
    • Education News
    • Scientific Advances
    • Podcast
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Cancer
    • Neurology and Neuroscience
    • Aging and Longevity
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • News Archives
  • About Us
    • Media Contact
    • Share Your News
    • News Feeds
    • Social Media
    • Contact Us
Menu
  • Categories
    • Campus News
    • Disease Discoveries
    • Clinical Breakthroughs
    • Education News
    • Scientific Advances
    • Podcast
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Cancer
    • Neurology and Neuroscience
    • Aging and Longevity
    • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • News Archives
  • About Us
    • Media Contact
    • Share Your News
    • News Feeds
    • Social Media
    • Contact Us
Home » Legal Landscape Affects Practice of Medicine
Uncategorized

Legal Landscape Affects Practice of Medicine

By medwebJun 1, 2007
Share
Facebook Twitter Email

Legal Landscape Affects Practice of Medicine

Feinberg School faculty member Katie Watson, JD, discusses recent U.S. Supreme Court cases of special interest to physicians.

Katherine (Katie) L. Watson, JD, lecturer in the Medical Humanities & Bioethics Program at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, says the legal landscape affecting the practice of medicine is changing in ways most citizens may not recognize. In a recent presentation called “Life, Death, Drugs, and Politics: Two Years of the Expanding Federal Role in the Regulation of Medicine,” she briefly described relevant recent pieces of legislation and three key U.S. Supreme Court cases. These laws and case rulings and the current administration’s conservative policies are shaping the legal environment, she said.

The first event Dr. Watson cited was President Bush signing a bill passed by Congress on March 21, 2005, allowing federal intervention in the Terry Schiavo case. This famous case involved end-of-life issues in which the wishes of Schiavo’s parents differed from those of her husband. The federal courts ultimately confirmed the decision of the Florida state courts, but allowing any federal court interference in that type of state court decision represented a unique federal intervention.

On April 22, 2005, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a memo announcing what it called “proactive enforcement” of the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002. Until then, federal enforcement had been lacking.

Two Supreme Court cases, Gonzales versus Raich, decided on June 6, 2005, and Gonzales versus Oregon, decided on January 17, 2006, litigated the limits of the federal government’s ability to essentially overturn state laws about physician prescribing. In the Raich case, the Supreme Court allowed federal policy to trump California’s approval of medical marijuana, but in the Oregon case, it rejected the Attorney General’s attempt to punish physicians who followed Oregon’s law regarding prescribing for physician-assisted suicide.

The most recent case Dr. Watson described was Gonzales versus Carhart, decided on April 18, 2007. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court reversed its course on abortion, upholding the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act by a single vote. Watson described this act as the first law that the court has found constitutional banning a type of abortion on moral grounds. The banned procedure, known medically as intact dilation and extraction, involves removing an intact fetus from the patient’s uterus, as opposed to the more common dismemberment technique. When enacted, members of Congress stated that this procedure too closely resembled infanticide. This vote shifted emphasis toward fetal life and away from medical judgments about women’s health because, unlike all previous abortion jurisprudence, the ban was upheld without a health exception.

More changes in Supreme Court rulings are projected due to the retirement of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor last year. Samuel A. Alito took her seat. Anthony M. Kennedy, called “the new swing justice,” wrote the decision in Gonzales versus Carhart.

After her presentation, Dr. Watson facilitated a discussion among the physician audience members, who clamored for more time. Several avidly volunteered their own medical practice experiences and insights. For instance, Lee Smith Jr., MD ’51, of North Manchester, Indiana, spoke about hospice care and terminal treatment as it is practiced in his state. William J. Frable, MD ’59, of Richmond, Virginia, talked about community standards versus state and federal standards as they relate to end-of-life care. James J. Hansen, MD ’67, of Spearfish, South Dakota, asked about the relevance of the U.S. Constitution, which delegates to states all powers not specifically granted to the federal government. Attendees stayed after the presentation to continue their lively debates, clearly interested in the future implications of federal involvement in medical practice.

Share. Facebook Twitter Email

Related Posts

Lurie Cancer Center Receives Merit Extension from NCI

Oct 20, 2021

Drug Combination May Reduce Risk of Leukemia Relapse

Mar 26, 2020

Rewriting the Role of a Transcription Factor

Mar 19, 2020

Comments are closed.

Latest News

Student Spearheads Ukraine Aid Efforts

Jun 27, 2022

Hospitals Bound to Patient Safety Rules that Aren’t all Backed by Evidence

Jun 24, 2022

Identifying Protein Interactions that Promote Cancer Growth

Jun 24, 2022

Combination Treatment May Improve Quality of Life in Kidney Cancer

Jun 23, 2022

Calcium Channel Blockers May Improve Chemotherapy Response

Jun 21, 2022
  • News Center Home
  • Categories
  • Press Release
  • Media Coverage
  • Editor’s Picks
  • News Archives
  • About Us
Flickr Photos
pride7
pride6
pride5
pride4
pride3
pride2
pride1
20220607_Feinberg Campus_0070
20220607_Feinberg Campus_0066
20220607_Feinberg Campus_0054
Northwestern University 2022. Photo by Jim Prisching
20220607_Feinberg Campus_0077

Northwestern University logo

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

RSS Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Flickr YouTube Instagram
Copyright © 2022 Northwestern University
  • Contact Northwestern University
  • Disclaimer
  • Campus Emergency Information
  • Policy Statements

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.